Characteristics

Sallie-Melissa Planning Area​
Watershed area​ 11,400 acres​
Land Use 12.6% Impervious​
34.3% Agriculture​
17.5% Forest​
30.4% Water​
5.2% Wetland​
Major Lakes Sallie, Melissa, Muskrat, St. Clair
Shallow Lakes Mill Pond, Mud Lake (near Sallie)
Streams/Public Ditches​ Pelican River, Ditch 14
Impaired ​ On the MPCA Impaired Waters List, Restoration necessary St. Clair (2016)
Enhance​ Enhance condition to prevent future impairment. Nearly Impaired/degrading trend. Sallie
Protect​ Maintain good condition and protect against future risks. Melissa, Muskrat, Mill Pond
More information needed for assessment​ Mud Lake (near Sallie)

Map

Description & Overview

The Sallie-Melissa Water Management Area is comprised of 11,400 acres, including Sallie and Melissa Lakes, the Pelican River (downstream of Little Detroit Lake), Ditch 14, and several small lakes called St. Clair, Muskrat, Mud, and Mill Pond. There are also numerous wetlands, many of which are associated with Ditch 14 and have been drained or partially drained.

There has been increased development pressure in this WMA. There is dense development surrounding Sallie and Melissa Lakes, with relatively small lots and extensive shoreline modifications. Little shoreline remains undeveloped, and in recent years, summer cottages have been converted to homes for year- round use. There is also residential development along the south side of Muskrat Lake and near the western shores of St. Clair Lake. Sallie and Melissa are the largest lakes in the Sallie-Melissa LWQMA, and together they account for about 90 percent of this WMA’s surface water. Sallie and Melissa are relatively deep lakes and support important game fish opportunities and other recreational opportunities.

Water quality concerns in this WMA center around improving water quality in Lake Sallie and St. Clair. Lake Sallie is currently considered vulnerable to nutrient impairment, and experiences nuisance algae blooms most summers. Improving water quality in Sallie should also help water quality in Melissa because Sallie is just upstream of Melissa. Lake St. Clair is also listed as impaired by the MPCA for excess nutrients and has an approved TMDL. St. Clair’s poor water quality is largely the result of its use as a receiving pond for partially treated sewage effluent for over 50 years. Thick, phosphorus-enriched sediments in St. Clair release phosphorus to the water column and cause severe algae blooms. An alum treatment in 1998 reduced phosphorus loading from to the lake, but after 20 years, the effectiveness of the alum treatment may be waning, as phosphorus concentrations are increasing back to impairment levels.

Aquatic invasive species are another big issue in the Sallie-Melissa WMA, particularly in Sallie, Melissa and Muskrat Lakes. Invasive aquatic vegetation such as Flowering rush and Curly-leaf pondweed interfere with boating and swimming, cause some damage to shorelines, and invade desirable native plant populations such as Bulrush. Since the 1960s,the District has employed mechanical harvesting and herbicide treatments as a means of mitigating aquatic vegetation problems. However, research conducted by the District determined that harvesting exacerbated the spread of Flowering rush, so the District discontinued harvesting practices in 2016. Herbicides are used to effectively manage Flowering rush as well as Curly-leaf pondweed. Zebra mussels are also present in Lake Melissa, Lake Sallie, and Muskrat Lake.

Water Quality

Waterbody/ies
Pollutant/Stressor
Focus
Goals
Actions

Pollutant/Stressor

Phosphorous

Focus

Tributary- Lake St. Clair and Ditch 14

Goals

Reduce nutrient loading to Sallie and Melissa.

Actions

  1. Manage St. Clair TMDL
  2. Treat Stormwater discharges through implementation of District Rules.
  3. Manage quality of upstream lakes and streams.
  4. Manage nutrient flushes from Ditch 14 Wetlands
  5. Manage internal loading in both Sallie and Melissa Lakes
  6. Identify and protect sensitive aquatic areas
  7. Conduct shoreline surveys
  8. Lakeshore protection through implementation of District Rules.

Pollutant/Stressor

Phosphorous

Focus

In-Lake/Tributary

Goals

Manage St. Clair TMDL

Actions

  1. Study internal loading in St. Clair.
  2. Investigate loading from drained Ditch 14 wetlands.
  3. Monitor water flow through Ditch 14 and Lake St. Clair to limit nutrient flushing
  4. Study feasibility of alum treatment in Lake St. Clair.

Pollutant/Stressor

Phosphorous

Focus

Tributary

Goals

Reduce nutrient loading to Muskrat Lake

Actions

  1. Manage St. Clair TMDL
  2. Treat Stormwater discharges through implementation of District Rules.
  3. Manage quality of upstream lakes and streams.
  4. Manage nutrient flushes from Ditch 14 Wetlands
  5. Identify and protect sensitive aquatic areas
  6. Conduct shoreline surveys
  7. Lakeshore protection through implementation of District Rules.

Pollutant/Stressor

Phosphorous

Focus

Tributary/Nearshore

Goals

Reduce nutrient loading from Lake St. Clair and surrounding wetlands.

Actions

  1. Study internal loading in Lake St. Clair
  2. Investigate loading from drained Ditch 14 wetlands.
  3. Monitor water flow through Ditch 14 and Lake St. Clair to limit nutrient flushing.
  4. Manage St. Clair TMDL.
  5. Study feasibility of an alum treatment in Lake St. Clair
  6. Manage stormwater runoff through implementation of District Rules.

Water Quantity

Waterbody/ies
Pollutant/Stressor
Focus
Goals
Actions
Lakes

Pollutant/Stressor

N/A

Focus

N/A

Goals

Promote shorelines resilient to fluctuating water levels.

Actions

Promote conversion of seawalls to naturalized shorelines

Groundwater

Pollutant/Stressor

N/A

Focus

N/A

Goals

Ensure a sustainable groundwater supply

Actions

Encourage installation of BMP’s that increase infiltration.

Ecological Integrity

Waterbody/ies
Pollutant/Stressor
Focus
Goals
Actions
All water bodies

Pollutant/Stressor

  • Climate change
  • Transportation of AIS
  • Habitat fragmentation and degradation

Focus

  • AIS
  • Wildlife Habitat
  • Fish communities

Goals

  • prevent establishment of new invasive species, and manage existing invasive species.
  • Protect and improve wildlife habitat in near shore areas
  • Maintain healthy fish communities.

Actions

  1. Develop readiness response
  2. Monitor access points for new AIS
  3. Continue to treat AIS infestations
  4. Continue to research new methods to manage AIS
  5. Perform periodic aquatic vegetation surveys
  6. Encourage pollinator friendly seed mixes and plantings
  7. Identify and protect sensitive aquatic Areas
  8. Assist MN DNR with creating fish passage past Bucks Mill Dam.